Coming to terms with a two-speed global economy
Mark Nash and Jupiter’s Fixed Income Alternatives team say the divergence in growth between the US and the rest of the world may stymie attempts to tame inflation.
It’s been a year of hopes and disappointments. The global economy, which was in the doldrums most of last year due to coronavirus, saw a ray of hope in the beginning of 2021 as vaccines promised to set things right. The buzz was all about reflation in the early part of the year, underpinned by easy monetary policy and copious fiscal spending.
As the year draws to a close, the excitement has died down. After briefly encountering the ominous term `stagflation’, inflation is threatening to play spoilsport now. Surging prices are worrying policymakers and financial markets alike. In most parts of the world, the rise in prices is attributed to supply crunch inflicted by skewed logistics during the pandemic. In the US, a surge in consumer demand added to supply chain issues, pushing inflation to the highest level in more than three decades. Higher oil and gas prices aren’t helpful either.
In this context, it’s natural to wonder what’s in store next year? All stakeholders are trying to second guess the course of action of major central banks to the situation. But they are caught in an uneasy conundrum: while economic growth optimism seems to have taken hold in the US, the rest of the world is still reeling in the aftermath of the pandemic.
China conundrum
Among central banks, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) has already started tapering asset purchases, the Bank of England had a false start with rate increases and the European Central Bank doesn’t seem to be in a hurry to do anything as its economy is far more aligned with China.
The key to solving this puzzle will be China, as the efforts of policy makers to deleverage the economy for greater financial stability has coincided with the pandemic. The weakness in the world’s second largest economy is driven by tighter fiscal spending, reduced capital expenditure and halting of credit splurge. High savings rate, which is typical of China, and lacklustre consumer demand are also not favourable factors. There are tell-tale signs of trouble in the property sector as exemplified by Evergrande.
Add to the mix a strong renminbi and high real rates, the prospect of a quick revival looks out of question. While exports are doing well, shipments aren’t good enough due to the worldwide sluggishness. China isn’t making any efforts at all to reflate and that doesn’t augur well for global growth.
Policy challenges
This scenario is captured by the aggressive bear flattening of the yield curve (yields on bonds due in the short term are rising faster than the long-term bonds). Bonds with lower maturity are rising briskly following the hawkish turn of central banks to tame inflation.
Policy makers can’t be seen to be doing nothing when inflation quickens. At the same time, they can’t afford to commit a policy mistake by tightening too early.
Currently, we are long dollar (expect dollar to rise) and short US rates (bet prices may fall) versus the rest of the world in our strategy. A rising dollar is cushioning high imported prices of goods, especially from China. I think the Fed would prefer a strong dollar and aim to tighten conditions with which finance can be accessed by businesses and households by inducing higher volatility.
Such a policy will prevent a substantial bond market selloff. However, a strong dollar may strain emerging markets as they’ll be forced to tighten their monetary policies to keep their currencies from sliding, which may again act as headwind for growth. The ingredients for a bond selloff are weaker dollar and/or low real rates and broad-based growth. We are not witnessing this now.
Rate hikes
As we enter the new year, the Fed will continue to talk tough about its policy intentions, which may create opportunities to buy Treasuries. Although market concern can grow about rate hikes, in the end we don’t expect their rate hikes to match what’s been priced in as growth outside of the US will be a concern. That’s why the terminal rate, the proxy for what the peak Fed Funds rate will be in the current cycle, has remained low. Volatility is likely to short circuit the front-end move eventually.
We will look to reset our views sometime in 2021 if the environment unfolds as we expect and we expect volatility, which will help to steepen the yield curves and make risk assets cheaper. We also expect emerging market assets to be cheap next year.
Read more about outlook 2022
Outlook 2023: Environmental solutions are crossing a watershed
Outlook 2023: Bonds are back
Outlook 2023: Shunning predictions to focus on sustainable trends
Outlook 2023: Recession, but that needn’t be bad for bonds
Outlook 2023: Is the time ripe for emerging markets?
Investment outlook 2022: the value of active minds
As the start of another pandemic-era year beckons, investors and the world at large are once again faced with the need actively to balance both opportunities and risks.
The value of active minds: independent thinking
A key feature of Jupiter’s investment approach is that we eschew the adoption of a house view, instead preferring to allow our specialist fund managers to formulate their own opinions on their asset class. As a result, it should be noted that any views expressed – including on matters relating to environmental, social and governance considerations – are those of the author(s), and may differ from views held by other Jupiter investment professionals.
Important Information
This document is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice. We recommend you discuss any investment decisions with a financial adviser, particularly if you are unsure whether an investment is suitable. Jupiter is unable to provide investment advice. Past performance is no guide to the future. Market and exchange rate movements can cause the value of an investment to fall as well as rise, and you may get back less than originally invested. The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing are not necessarily those of Jupiter as a whole and may be subject to change. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market circumstances. For definitions please see the glossary at jupiteram.com. Every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of any information provided but no assurances or warranties are given. Company examples are for illustrative purposes only and not a recommendation to buy or sell. Issued in the UK by Jupiter Asset Management Limited (JAM), registered address: The Zig Zag Building, 70 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6SQ is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Issued in the EU by Jupiter Asset Management International S.A. (JAMI), registered address: 5, Rue Heienhaff, Senningerberg L-1736, Luxembourg which is authorised and regulated by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. For investors in Hong Kong: Issued by Jupiter Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited (JAM HK) and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission. No part of this document may be reproduced in any manner without the prior permission of JAM/JAMI/JAM HK. 28340