Gaining an active edge in an environment of tight spreads
Hilary Blandy discusses the environment of tight spreads in credit markets, and how active investors can seek to gain an edge through credit research.
Does the current tightness of spreads present a risk for high yield investors? Not necessarily. Historical data shows that the high yield market often trades tighter-than-average for extended periods of time, and on some occasions have done so for years. Most notably this happened in 2003, when spreads remained below median for over 4 years.
Source: Bloomberg, to 30.04.2024
Importantly, in a tight spread environment the upside potential from any further tightening in spreads is generally limited. For investors this is a challenge as, while there will always be idiosyncratic credit stories that offer good opportunities, these are rare gems that can be hard to find when the overall market trades tight. So credit investors need to get more creative about the ways they can seek to generate alpha.
Unlike investment grade bonds, which have bullet maturities, high yield bonds are callable. This creates uncertainty around the likely refinancing date, and means it is harder for markets to efficiently price these bonds. When we invest in short dated high yield, we look to identify bonds where we believe the market has not correctly priced in the likely repayment date and where there may be significant upside from an earlier call. These bonds also typically exhibit lower levels of volatility than longer dated bonds in the market; and so on a risk adjusted basis, this style of investing can generate very attractive levels of return.
The short-lived nature of these opportunities is advantageous from a credit research perspective, because our analysts can forecast a company’s performance with more confidence over the short term than the long term. This is a double-edged sword, however, as capital needs to be frequently recycled into new ideas as the bonds are refinanced. The work needed to do this is both highly skilled and very labour intensive, and so investors wishing to adopt this approach will generally need to be supported by large teams of experienced analysts, as we have at Jupiter.
Understandably, CFOs of the issuing companies have hardly rushed to refinance this debt given how relatively attractive – from the company’s perspective – the coupons are in the context of current markets. The upshot of this is that the proportion of relatively short-dated bonds in the market has increased.
Source: Bloomberg. As of 04.30.24. “BBs”, “Bs”, and “CCCs” are the sub-indices for those ratings of the ICE BofA Global High Yield Constrained Index.
On the subject of refinancing, one interesting trend we have observed recently is for issuers to tender for bonds, rather than calling them. The tender will be below the call price, but generally investors of the tendered bonds are offered preferential allocations on the newly refinanced issue. This can be advantageous for investors when the new issue pricing is attractive; however we would caution that a discerning approach is warranted here. The risk profile of the newer, and obviously longer-dated, bonds will be very different to those that have been refinanced. In a longer-dated instrument, bondholders are required to take a longer view over factors such as the performance of the company; the spread environment and the evolution of the macro environment. In the current tight spread environment, we are cautious about those risks as often we find prices do not offer sufficient compensation for them. We therefore take a disciplined approach, often preferring to stay in the shorter-dated refinancing trades instead rather than switch into longer dated new issues.
In our view, the combination of tight spreads, relatively low cash prices, and relatively short duration bonds creates an interesting opportunity for active investors. Those able to correctly identify bonds that trade below par with a high probability of being refinanced quickly, can generate very attractive levels of yield as the difference between the purchase price (below par) and the par repayment is crystallised over a short time frame. Even in today’s tight spread environment, we are still able to find very attractive investment opportunities using this technique, whilst at the same time minimising beta. This investment style relies on thorough credit research, but we believe the depth of expertise we have at Jupiter equips us well to do exactly that.
This communication is intended for investment professionals* and is not for the use or benefit of other persons, including retail investors. This communication is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice. Market and exchange rate movements can cause the value of an investment to fall as well as rise, and you may get back less than originally invested. The views expressed are those of the author(s) at the time of writing, are not necessarily those of Jupiter as a whole and may be subject to change. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market circumstances. Every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of any information provided but no assurances or warranties are given. Issued in the UK by Jupiter Asset Management Limited, registered address: The Zig Zag Building, 70 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6SQ is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Issued in the EU by Jupiter Asset Management International S.A. (JAMI), registered address: 5, Rue Heienhaff, Senningerberg L-1736, Luxembourg which is authorised and regulated by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. Issued in Hong Kong by Jupiter Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited (JAM HK) and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission. No part of this [commentary] may be reproduced in any manner without the prior permission of JAM, JAMI or JAM HK.
*In Hong Kong, investment professionals refer to Professional Investors as defined under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong) and in Singapore, Institutional Investors as defined under Section 304 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore.